I have been a fan of David Leavitt's work since his debut collection of stories, Family Dancing, in 1984. Literate, deeply felt, somewhat otherworldly, they usually feature cerebral, quirky characters who feel they are outsiders. My thoughts on his last novel, The Indian Clerk are here. His latest is set in Lisbon in 1940. Two Hotel Francforts (Bloomsbury, 2013) also deals with persons in exile, in this case they are mostly refugees fleeing the Nazis. This is where Edward and Iris Freleng, a wealthy couple who write detective fiction, meet Peter and Julia Winters, ex-pat Americans who had been living in Paris. Julia has been running from a troubled past, or perhaps seeking a new, more sophisticated identity, by living in Europe, but now, as a Jew, is compelled to return home. Peter is a car salesman. Iris and Edward are guiltily fleeing the abandonment of their disabled child. Amidst this maelstrom of personal drama and the desperate flight of thousands of refugees, Peter and Edward have an affair.
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Sunday, October 13, 2013
What we lose by keeping quiet (Books - Days in the History of Silence by Merethe Lindstrom)
Norwegian novelist Merethe Lindstrom's Days in the History of Silence (Other Press, 2011 trans. Anne Bruce) is an intimate unearthing of the most private spaces in an aging woman's mind. Lindstrom's to-the-point prose makes Eva's lonely struggle come alive. The voice is fresh, even as the moment-to-moment events are mundane - aimless drives, tidying the kitchen, struggles between parents and children, the indignities of aging.
Oddly enough, the great work this novel most brings to mind is Shakespeare's Hamlet. Although the protagonist is not young and male here, but elderly and female, the inciting incident is loss. In this case, it is loss of Eva's husband, Simon. Simon isn't dead, but he has stopped speaking. This may have arisen from a psychological cause. During his childhood, Simon and his family were hidden from the Nazis by a non Jewish family. This meant he was obliged to make as little sound as possible, and almost never exposed to air and sunlight. He acquires from this experience a habit of silence. He is a wounded man - having experienced many losses, and he also develops a shame around being Jewish - an aspect of himself he hid from his daughters. Simon and Eva are both advanced in years, and one or two ambiguous sentences suggested that Simon's silence could also have been the result of a stroke. But the exact cause is a wound, whether to brain or psyche is not precisely important. The dismissal of their housekeeper, Marija, a key event in this novel, results in Eva's isolation. Her chief conflict is whether she will sign a paper, urged upon her by her concerned daughters, committing Simon to an old age home. Here is the similarity to Hamlet, because Eva is stuck, and the action of this novel might be seen as the unfolding of her hesitation, a paradox, since it demands movement from stasis.
Oddly enough, the great work this novel most brings to mind is Shakespeare's Hamlet. Although the protagonist is not young and male here, but elderly and female, the inciting incident is loss. In this case, it is loss of Eva's husband, Simon. Simon isn't dead, but he has stopped speaking. This may have arisen from a psychological cause. During his childhood, Simon and his family were hidden from the Nazis by a non Jewish family. This meant he was obliged to make as little sound as possible, and almost never exposed to air and sunlight. He acquires from this experience a habit of silence. He is a wounded man - having experienced many losses, and he also develops a shame around being Jewish - an aspect of himself he hid from his daughters. Simon and Eva are both advanced in years, and one or two ambiguous sentences suggested that Simon's silence could also have been the result of a stroke. But the exact cause is a wound, whether to brain or psyche is not precisely important. The dismissal of their housekeeper, Marija, a key event in this novel, results in Eva's isolation. Her chief conflict is whether she will sign a paper, urged upon her by her concerned daughters, committing Simon to an old age home. Here is the similarity to Hamlet, because Eva is stuck, and the action of this novel might be seen as the unfolding of her hesitation, a paradox, since it demands movement from stasis.
Saturday, October 5, 2013
An Intellectual Tourist's Guide to Multiple Universes (Books - The Secret Knowledge by Andrew Crumey)
The Secret Knowledge (Dedalus, 2013) by Andrew Crumey was recommended by John Self, and I can't say that I liked the novel quite as much as as I liked the thinkers and thoughts kicking around in it - Theodore Adorno, Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin. The year is 1913. The composer Pierre Klauer is filled with excitement about the symphony he is writing entitled The Secret Knowledge. He proposes marriage to Yvette, but only minutes later his body is found - a gunshot wound to the head. Was it murder or suicide? Or is he dead at all, since he appears in subsequent scenes in the 1920s and 30s. In the present day, the pianist David Conroy receives the score of The Secret Knowledge. As he prepares to perform it, he begins receiving strange visits and feels he may be caught up in a conspiracy of some kind. Or is he just losing his mind?
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Excavating layers of narrative in search of the elusive truth (Books - The Sound of Things Falling by Juan Gabriel Vasquez)
Themes of truth-telling and father-child relationships were the subject of Juan Gabriel Vasquez's The Informers, which I wrote about here and here. They are echoed in The Sound of Things Falling (Riverhead Book, 2013), but not in a way that feels either repetitive or formulaic. The narrative voice in this latest novel, translated by Anne McLean, is also that of a literate and cerebral man, Antonio Yammara. These qualities slow the pace of reading down in a way that initially made me impatient, but allowed reflection as Vasquez's narrator reflects, and ultimately encouraged my becomming enveloped in multiple layers of text.
And that's how this story got under way. I don't know what good it does us to remember, what benefits or possible penalties it brings, or how what we've lived through can change when we remember it, but remembering Ricardo Laverde well has become an urgent matter for me. I read somewhere that a man should tell the story of his life at the age of forty, and this deadline is fast approaching: as I write these lines, only a few shot weeks remain before this ominous birthday arrives. The story of his life. No, I won't tell my life story, just a few days of it that happened a long time ago, and I'll do so fully aware that this story, as they warn in fairy tales, has happened before and will happen again.The story here is national as well as personal. Born in Columbia in the 1970s, it should not be surprising that Vasquez looks to stories to uncover the truth - so embroiled was his country in corruption and drug trade. Antonio, who uses literature to teach law, begins his story by telling us about telling stories. This self-awareness as artifice is not only revealing of the self-consciousness of the narrator, but is an effective technique for eliciting our belief. When you reveal the back wall of the theatre, you no longer need to rely on stage tricks or fend off disbelief - all you are asking of your audience is to believe they're in a theatre, which is the truth. Whatever world you create from there, you create together.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Mesmeric healer or spoiled prodigy? (Books - The Bellwether Revivals by Benjamin Wood)
Benjamin Wood has written a suspenseful, smart psychological thriller in The Bellwether Revivals (Penguin, 2013). Working in Cambridge in a nursing home, Oscar Lowe is drawn into a chapel one day by the sound of the organ. There he meets Iris Bellwether, whose brother Eden plays the organ.
Eden, a spoiled mesmeric boy, believes he has the power to cure people of their ailments. He surrounds himself with people who either believe him or are afraid to disabuse him of this idea, but the evidence is confusing, and this is the crux of the story - is he a healer or does he suffer from delusions of grandeur and a pathological need to control everyone around him?
Wood has created a likeably eccentric cast of characters and draws the reader in with an assured hand. He plays nimbly with the limits of our knowledge of the human mind. Psychology is a science in that it can measure states of mind and creates lenses to help us visualize the forces that drive human behavior - but it does not predict the behavior of any individual person. Wood draws a wonderfully compelling character in psychologist Herbert Crest, an expert on Narcissitic Personality Disorder who, when we meet him, is fatally ill and longing for a miracle cure. His appearance actively embodies the paradoxical terrain explored in the novel without being too explanatory. It is a pity Wood was tempted to include a piece of writing by the fictional Crest in his epilogue, in which he pits the scientific against the supernatural. This edged the novel toward an ending that was a trifle big for its britches. I know pitting science against belief is a popular gladiator sport these days, but frankly, it's a false dichotomy and it got close to ruining the book's delightfully modest tone, set by the likeable protagonist. But this debut novel had too much going for it for that to spoil it. The suspense drove this novel's with an energetic and urgent rhythm and, in the end, Wood's characters mature in a believable and a satisfying way.
When he asked for her name, she replied: 'It's Iris. Like the genus.'As they begin a relationship Oscar, a self-educated and independent young man who grew up on a council estate is drawn into the strange circle of Iris, Eden, and their posh coterie of fellow Cambridge students, who all grew up knowing that they are 'not most people.'
And he laughed - just a short vent of air from his nose, but enough for her to step back and say, 'What's so funny?'
'Most people would say like the flower, that's all.'
'Well, I'm not most people. I'm not going to say it's like the flower when I know perfectly well that it's a genus. And I'll tell you something else.' She broike for a gulp of breath. 'I know exactly which variety I am. Iris milifolia. The hardest one to look after.'
Eden, a spoiled mesmeric boy, believes he has the power to cure people of their ailments. He surrounds himself with people who either believe him or are afraid to disabuse him of this idea, but the evidence is confusing, and this is the crux of the story - is he a healer or does he suffer from delusions of grandeur and a pathological need to control everyone around him?
Wood has created a likeably eccentric cast of characters and draws the reader in with an assured hand. He plays nimbly with the limits of our knowledge of the human mind. Psychology is a science in that it can measure states of mind and creates lenses to help us visualize the forces that drive human behavior - but it does not predict the behavior of any individual person. Wood draws a wonderfully compelling character in psychologist Herbert Crest, an expert on Narcissitic Personality Disorder who, when we meet him, is fatally ill and longing for a miracle cure. His appearance actively embodies the paradoxical terrain explored in the novel without being too explanatory. It is a pity Wood was tempted to include a piece of writing by the fictional Crest in his epilogue, in which he pits the scientific against the supernatural. This edged the novel toward an ending that was a trifle big for its britches. I know pitting science against belief is a popular gladiator sport these days, but frankly, it's a false dichotomy and it got close to ruining the book's delightfully modest tone, set by the likeable protagonist. But this debut novel had too much going for it for that to spoil it. The suspense drove this novel's with an energetic and urgent rhythm and, in the end, Wood's characters mature in a believable and a satisfying way.
Sunday, September 22, 2013
The bookish musings of Dr. bookeywookey
It has been a while, I know. I had a small matter to attend to - the completion and defense of my dissertation. Now that I am Dr. Bookeywookey, don't feel intimidated (smile) or obliged to take my posts too seriously.
Despite the preparations, I somehow managed to squeeze a few books in, but I didn't have it in me to write another word or visit many of my fellow bloggers. I don't imagine that I'm going to remember what I've read in any great detail, but let's see what emerges...
Stephen King's Joyland (Hard Case Crime, 2013) - his take on pulp crime fiction set in the carny scene is firmly planted in time and place.
I have not read Dr. Hosseini's other blockbusters. I read And the Mountains Echoed (Riverhead, 2013) for book club and it really made me want to know what the fuss was all about. I found two strengths in this novel - the creation of memorable characters and a mission-driven impulse to present Afghani culture as hetererogeneous, humanizing it for the "Western" reader. I respect that. But I found the story telling, except for a few flashes of true inspiration, undisciplined, and the writing lazy. There were anachronisms, confusing use of pronouns, and repetitiveness in descriptive phrasing that made me wonder how carefully the book had been edited. More than ten principle characters' were introduced in this novel, but in 300-odd pages, they could hardly be developed. That left some to be summed up with cliche and others feeling like props that had been picked up by an actor, but never used. Paragraphs describing one character's illness employed medical jargon and details about medication that seemed ripped directly from a clinical patient report. Knowing absolutely nothing of Hosseini's bio, I stopped reading and thought - he must be a doctor. I checked his bio out on Google and, sure enough, he is. Despite the more richly drawn characters, whom I came to know deeply enough so that I can visualize them, I finished this book feeling the author should have taken more care. Perhaps the publisher knew they could get a movie deal based on his previous sales and just didn't give a hoot.
I read Christopher Priest's The Adjacent (Gollancz, 2013) based on John Self's recommendation, and found it involving and clever. He mixes a dystopian future rendering of our world devastated by extreme weather and attacks using a weapon that scarily changes the physical structure of the world (the adjacency), a wonderful yarn set during World War II in England, and the story of an illusionist (well actually two illusionists), one living during World War I and the other in an imagined archipelago in some hard-to-be-determined, perhaps adjacent, time.
Regrettably, I am not going to remember where I read in the last two months that Jo Ann Beard's autobiographical essay The Fourth State of Matter is a model of non fiction writing. I'm thinking it might have been in a piece by Phillip Lopate. Anyway, the essay is in the collection The Boys of my Youth (Back Bay Books, 1999), but the book is full of one marvelous essay after another - about her poor father's drinking, about her mother and aunt fishing, about a terrible event Beard experienced while working at the University of Iowa. Why should I care about this stranger's life, you may ask? But her sentences lend the boredome, deep pleasures, longings, and misgivings of ordinary life true grace. She fashions sentences so deft you want to live in them.
Despite the preparations, I somehow managed to squeeze a few books in, but I didn't have it in me to write another word or visit many of my fellow bloggers. I don't imagine that I'm going to remember what I've read in any great detail, but let's see what emerges...
Stephen King's Joyland (Hard Case Crime, 2013) - his take on pulp crime fiction set in the carny scene is firmly planted in time and place.
1973 was the year of the OPEC oil embargo, the year Richard Nixon announced he was not a crook, the year Edward G. Robinson and Noel Coward died. It was Devin Jones's lost year. I was a twenty-one year old virgin with literary aspirations. I possessed three pairs of bluejeans, four pairs of Jockey shorts, a clunker Ford (with a good radio), occasional suicidal ideations, and a broken heart.This quick piece of entertainment explicitly doesn't aspire to high literary art, but that doesn't mean it is not deftly, assuredly crafted. The writing is clean, atmospheric, and nostalgic, but the time is less the 1970s that it is the narrator's youth. Although the mystery plot yanks you through the pages with purpose, this is an excavation of innocence and its loss. Why, the writer wants to know with a backward look from his 60s, wasn't he good enough for old Wendy? Despite the vintage pulp book cover, the artistry here is the layering of the younger character's insecurity mixed with the narrator's mature persepctive - one that is both knowledgeable and yet still smarts with the legacy of that old wound.
Sweet, huh?
The Heartbreaker was Wendy Keegan, and she didn't deserve me.
I have not read Dr. Hosseini's other blockbusters. I read And the Mountains Echoed (Riverhead, 2013) for book club and it really made me want to know what the fuss was all about. I found two strengths in this novel - the creation of memorable characters and a mission-driven impulse to present Afghani culture as hetererogeneous, humanizing it for the "Western" reader. I respect that. But I found the story telling, except for a few flashes of true inspiration, undisciplined, and the writing lazy. There were anachronisms, confusing use of pronouns, and repetitiveness in descriptive phrasing that made me wonder how carefully the book had been edited. More than ten principle characters' were introduced in this novel, but in 300-odd pages, they could hardly be developed. That left some to be summed up with cliche and others feeling like props that had been picked up by an actor, but never used. Paragraphs describing one character's illness employed medical jargon and details about medication that seemed ripped directly from a clinical patient report. Knowing absolutely nothing of Hosseini's bio, I stopped reading and thought - he must be a doctor. I checked his bio out on Google and, sure enough, he is. Despite the more richly drawn characters, whom I came to know deeply enough so that I can visualize them, I finished this book feeling the author should have taken more care. Perhaps the publisher knew they could get a movie deal based on his previous sales and just didn't give a hoot.
I read Christopher Priest's The Adjacent (Gollancz, 2013) based on John Self's recommendation, and found it involving and clever. He mixes a dystopian future rendering of our world devastated by extreme weather and attacks using a weapon that scarily changes the physical structure of the world (the adjacency), a wonderful yarn set during World War II in England, and the story of an illusionist (well actually two illusionists), one living during World War I and the other in an imagined archipelago in some hard-to-be-determined, perhaps adjacent, time.
Another kind of misdirection is in the use of adjacency. The magician places two objects close together, or connects them in some way, but one is made to be more interesting (or intriguing, or amusing) to the audience. It might have an odd or suggestive shape, or it appears to have something inside it, or it suddenly starts doing something the magician seems not to have noticed. The actual set-up is unimportant - what matters is that the audience, however briefly, should become interested and look away in the wrong direction.This engaging book is unselfconsciously written. It mixes wartime romance and adventure, a scary imagining of our future, and a recognizable story of loss in the context of attack. Its originality is that, by incorporating an idea that straddles modern physics and magic, it makes what could just be a clever sci-fi idea, a touching story.
An adept conjuror knows exactly how to create an adjacet distraction, and also knows when to make use of the invisibility it temporarily creates.
Regrettably, I am not going to remember where I read in the last two months that Jo Ann Beard's autobiographical essay The Fourth State of Matter is a model of non fiction writing. I'm thinking it might have been in a piece by Phillip Lopate. Anyway, the essay is in the collection The Boys of my Youth (Back Bay Books, 1999), but the book is full of one marvelous essay after another - about her poor father's drinking, about her mother and aunt fishing, about a terrible event Beard experienced while working at the University of Iowa. Why should I care about this stranger's life, you may ask? But her sentences lend the boredome, deep pleasures, longings, and misgivings of ordinary life true grace. She fashions sentences so deft you want to live in them.
It is five A.M. A duck stands up, shakes out its feathers, and peers above the still grass at the edge of the water. The skin of the lake twitches suddenly and a fish springs loose into the air, drops back down with a flat splash. Ripples move across the surface like radio waves. The sun hoists itself up and gets busy, laying a sparkling rug across the water, burning the beads of dew off the reeds, baking the tops of our mothers' heads. One puts on sunglasses and the other a plaid fishing cap with a wide brim.This is the kind of writing I envy. It makes the reader feel that this person has lived these real moments in her life and is writing from them, and at the same time she is an artist working in a medium called language, and another medium called story, and she has created something with her will, and with experience of her tools, that has its own integrity. She has made something more real and more true than just what happened. Something loving, unsentimental, whose resonance is eternal. And you can watch her doing it, and, aware of the craft, you can believe the events all the more. Damn, she's good. If you love what good writing can do - read this. I plan to come back to it several times.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Stephen King on First Lines in The Atlantic (Creative Process)
It's the six-week count-down to my dissertation defense so, in case you haven't noticed, I haven't been doing much writing. Not here. But I recommend that you head over to The Atlantic where Joe Fassler primed the pump for Stephen King's musings on the opening sentences of novels: Why Stephen King Spends 'Months and Even Years' Writing Opening Sentences. King is beautiful and insightful on writing.
You've been here before.
All there by itself on one page, inviting the reader to keep reading. It suggests a familiar story; at the same time, the unusual presentation brings us outside the realm of the ordinary. And this, in a way, is a promise of the book that's going to come. The story of neighbor against neighbor is the oldest story in the world, and yet this telling is (I hope) strange and somehow different...
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Making home on a changing island (Books - Fragrant Harbour by John Lanchester)
A capsule will have to suffice for this entertaining read on multiple generations of English ex-pats in Hong Kong. This is the first novel by John Lanchester I have read. Fragrant Harbour is itself fragrant with a sense of place.
We went down the hill, toward one of Hong Kong's most amazing spectacles, the Sunday gathering of Filipina amahs around Statue Square, spilling out toward Legco, the park, the Exchange. You hear it long before you see it, a high fluttering sounds, a cross between a roar and a twitter, like thousands of birds, like no other human sounds you've ever heard. The noise made by ten thousand Filipinas all talking at the same time isn't like a crowd event, a march or a rally or a sporting match, since they aren't concentrating on an external entity but on one another - eating and swapping picnics, swapping news and reading letters from home, listening to music, shopping at the impromptu market that features carefully targeted goods (like big, cheap folding suitcases, ultracheap towels and T-shirts), swapping photos, but all, mostly, talking, all the time.Lanchester's writing makes details of time and place vibrate with life. He tells a good story too, or really, he tells many - of multiple generations who lived from the 1930s to the present day. One cares about each of the characters a great deal, but I was not equally compelled by every succeeding story. And did they ever fuse into one? The last, a modern-day story, particularly stands apart. This is partly because we go from times in which people spoke to each other in person, or wrote letters, to one in which we live thousands of miles from someone and communicate with a brief call, email, or text - and yet, this novel seems to say, we remain miles apart. I'm not sure that this quite comes together, but this is a novel about people who don't hang onto the past but instead remake themselves in a brand new place and, as such, it is about a certain sense of unrootedness and yet, it all relates to a common place. An unusual paradox, but one that makes enjoyable reading.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Getting in touch in the cold desert of the modern world (Books - A Hologram for the King by Dave Eggers)
I'm a fan of Dave Eggers clean, mission-infused writing from having read What is the What, a fictionalized biography of one of Sudan's lost boys. A Hologram for the King (Vintage, 2012) is more straightforwardly novelistic, that is, it is not about anyone Eggers knew. And yet. And yet, it is a portrait of a man we all know, a man of our times. Alan Clay is an IT salesman and a dreamer. He is divorced, can no longer pay his mortgage or his daughter's college tuition. He is trying to make one last sale to hold his work-driven life together. So he comes to a poorly air conditioned, nearly empty tent in the middle of the Saudi Arabian desert to make a business pitch to the King. Only, neither he nor anyone else know when the king will arrive. He makes the trip day after day, week after week, hoping for his chance to sell his wares - a system which includes the ability to have business meetings via hologram - and put his life back together. And succeed.
Eggers places Alan thousands of miles from home, separated from his wife, unable to speak with his father on the phone for two minutes without a fight, composing countless openings to a letter to his daughter which end balled up in the waste bin. He has a frightening growth on his neck. His life consists of endless waiting, of receptionists who will not let him speak with another person. Eggers creates a sense of place that is barren. Where most of the things that move and express are electronic.
Eggers places Alan thousands of miles from home, separated from his wife, unable to speak with his father on the phone for two minutes without a fight, composing countless openings to a letter to his daughter which end balled up in the waste bin. He has a frightening growth on his neck. His life consists of endless waiting, of receptionists who will not let him speak with another person. Eggers creates a sense of place that is barren. Where most of the things that move and express are electronic.
A the end of the hall he spotted an elevator door closing. He jogged to it and thrust his hand into the gap. The doors jerked back, startled and apologetic.Here success means that Alan's will connect the king, if he ever comes, with another person who is not really there.
Everywhere, relationships no longer mattered, Alan knew this. They did not matter in American, they did not matter much of anywhere, but here, among the royals, he hoped that friendship had meaning.A Hologram for the King is a man's journey to get back in touch. To remember the value of other lives. To move from asking people's name as a sales technique, to having some sort of authentic contact with other living persons, not figments in his head. To have real encounters with real people, not build holograms for kings. It is a keenly observed book, the voice reminding me more of Didion's essays than anything else - spare writing which looks, sees, and describes. The book's effect opines, but Eggers's narrative doesn't preach. Amidst his clean prose is a message of genuine warmth.
Sunday, July 7, 2013
Doors slam on old identities on a Greek Isle (Books - Skios by Michael Frayn)
I have enjoyed Michael Frayn's plays and memoir, so I was excited to find his Skios on the table at my favorite bookstore. It is billed as a farcical beach read, a satire of academia, with serious philosophical undercurrents and I thought it would be an enjoyable distraction. In it, a famous academic is scheduled to deliver a lecture at a philanthropic institution on a Greek Isle while a wastrel with a shock of blond hair has a scheduled tryst elsewhere on the Isle. The two are mixed up, but as they take up residence in the others lives they are each changed, sort of. Farce? Yes, complete with door slamming and cell phone mishaps. Satire of academia? Perhaps. But its machinations with mistaken identities and the wish to crawl into someone else's life were superficial, hardly philosophical. I could see every coincidence in Skios coming from nine miles away. But it's good for a laugh or two and there are one or two clever moments. My favorite: the academic ends up involved with the woman who had expected to have a tryst with the layabout (who is now posing as an academic). The woman has two moles, and as he reviews his lecture...
He turned over more pages, but his mind was wandering. Two dark spots had appeared in the air between him and the page like importunate flies. He brushed them aside. He turned back to the section about the overall framework of social responsibility. The two dark spots reappeared. they were two moles, he realized. They had become detached from the shoulder blade on which they lived, and taken up residence inside his brain.Frayn plots cleverly and crafts clear and even elegant sentences, but, philosophical? Not really
Saturday, June 29, 2013
To fly, to dream,...or to stop dreaming? (Books - The Woman Upstairs by Claire Messud)
Nora Eldridge, the narrator of Claire Messud's new novel The Woman Upstairs (Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), is a school teacher and a dutiful daughter caring for an infirm parent. She is 42,
What I found so wonderful about this shout of a novel is the way it lays bare the duality of human nature through its narrator and protagonist: Nora and Sirena. Nora is a tight, a New Englander, and Sirena a free-spirited Italian married to a Lebanese. Nora is a single, a school teacher, Sirena a mother with a unwieldy family life. Nora a pragmatist, who takes obligation seriously, a ruminator. Sirena passionate, serving her own needs, alive in the present. They end up sharing studio space and while Serena makes a sprawling, mythic construction that uses Alice in Wonderland as a jumping-off point. Her audience can walk through this work. It features a heart at is center, pumping rose water instead of blood - a playground of the sensual with smells, sounds - one where its heart is literally visible and the interaction between audience and art becomes a kind of improvisation. Nora makes tiny boxes - realistic depictions of great artists - who made art despite the roles their time prescribed for them - Emily Dickinson, Virginia Woolf, Alice Neel - but her audience stands outside and looks in - just like Nora.
Nora sits in between the roles fashioned for her by others, templates she's very dependent on (as are many of us), and the role she imagines for herself in some foggy, unspecific view of the future - a future in which she will gain courage and take over herself, a future, in which she will make great art and light the world on fire - well, that, or just accept that she's not the type, that she's just an average Jane, and to like it....which is a lot more like middle age than forty or even forty-one. Neither old nor young, I'm neither fat nor thin, tall nor short, blond nor brunette, neither pretty nor plain. Quite nice looking in some moments, I think is the consensus, rather like the heroines of Harlequin romances, read in quantity in my youth. I'm neither married nor divorced, but single. What they used to call a spinster, but don't anymore, because it implies that you're dried up, and none of us wants to be that.
All these years, I was wrong, you see. Most people around me, too. And especially now that I've learned that I really am invisible, I need to stop wanting to fly. I want to stop needing to fly. I want it all to do over again; but also I don't. I want to make my nothingness count. Don't think it's impossible.The trouble is that Nora needs others to tell her who she is. She is not willing to reject their formulas, and that makes her angry as hell. She's believed all this time that she's been mildly disappointed, but it takes meeting the Shahid family, particularly Sirena - a visual artist - someone seemingly free of these demands, to find out she's actually furious.
What I found so wonderful about this shout of a novel is the way it lays bare the duality of human nature through its narrator and protagonist: Nora and Sirena. Nora is a tight, a New Englander, and Sirena a free-spirited Italian married to a Lebanese. Nora is a single, a school teacher, Sirena a mother with a unwieldy family life. Nora a pragmatist, who takes obligation seriously, a ruminator. Sirena passionate, serving her own needs, alive in the present. They end up sharing studio space and while Serena makes a sprawling, mythic construction that uses Alice in Wonderland as a jumping-off point. Her audience can walk through this work. It features a heart at is center, pumping rose water instead of blood - a playground of the sensual with smells, sounds - one where its heart is literally visible and the interaction between audience and art becomes a kind of improvisation. Nora makes tiny boxes - realistic depictions of great artists - who made art despite the roles their time prescribed for them - Emily Dickinson, Virginia Woolf, Alice Neel - but her audience stands outside and looks in - just like Nora.
Saturday, June 22, 2013
We are the actors in history (Books - The File by Timothy Garton Ash)
The 1989 civil overthrow of Soviet rule in Eastern Europe was one of the most influential revolutions of recent history, and feels somehow quickly forgotten. Following it, each of the USSR's dominions had to find a way suitable to its culture to transition away from totalitarian communism, and paranoia induced spying. While under Soviet rule,the East German State Security Service or STASI recruited an incredible number of its own populace as informers
For Timothy Garton Ash, an Oxford student in the 1970s writing his thesis on Berlin under Hitler, it was an opportunity to think about the interaction of the political with the personal on two levels. On the one hand he sought to understand the impact of the state on these individuals - what motivated his informers (he's now a respected political journalist and author of many books on the revolutions of 1989 - here's a link to my thoughts on his The Magic Lantern ). On the other, he could examine his own experience as a young man present at a key event in history, considering how subjective memory informs the telling of history. As he puts it
According to internal records, in 1988 - the last "normal" year of the GDR - the Ministry for State Security had more than 170,000 "unofficial collaborators." Of these, some 110,000 were regular informers, while the others were involved in "conspiratorial" services such as lending their flats for secret meetings or were simply listed as reliable contacts. The ministry itself had over 90,000 full-time employees, of whom less than 5,000 were in the HVA foreign intelligence wing. Setting the total figure against the adult population in the same year, this means that about one out of every fifty adult East Germans had a direct connection with the secret police.It was not unusual for people to be informed on by co-workers, neighbors, friends, lovers, spouses or children. The East Germans had quite a bit of work to do to reeducate its citizens about history, economics, law, and and the role of the state. Most of the adult population in 1989 had known only Soviet rule or, if they were old enough, the Nazis. So following the fall of the Berlin wall, Germany made the contents of STASI files available to anyone who had one, allowing them to know who informed on them, and what they believed was known about them. This effort at transparency often became an exercise in counter-recrimination. In some cases, mostly for higher-ups, justice was pursued legally. In others, the discovery of betrayal by friends and family was life-altering and devastating.
For Timothy Garton Ash, an Oxford student in the 1970s writing his thesis on Berlin under Hitler, it was an opportunity to think about the interaction of the political with the personal on two levels. On the one hand he sought to understand the impact of the state on these individuals - what motivated his informers (he's now a respected political journalist and author of many books on the revolutions of 1989 - here's a link to my thoughts on his The Magic Lantern ). On the other, he could examine his own experience as a young man present at a key event in history, considering how subjective memory informs the telling of history. As he puts it
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Film - Hannah Arendt (2012)
Director, Margarethe von Trotta and actress Barbara Sukowa made Rosa Luxemburg, a film about the life and politics of the provocative socialist. Though it came out in 1986, I still remember it. So when I heard they had teemed up again to make a film about philosopher Hannah Arendt, I didn't want to miss it. Arendt's coverage of the Adolph Eichmann trials in Jerusalem in 1961 in The New Yorker was, to say the least, controversial and provoked incendiary reactions. Her goal, though, according to this film, was to use thought to understand the man rather than to judge him. This appears, too, to be von Trotta's mantra. She makes intimate films about the interior lives of women who profoundly influenced the politics of their era to explore their motives and the consequences of living as they did for a cause. It is a relief to see a film about the value of thought in the context of politics - especially politics that provokes strong feelings. We could do with a little of that. And if that weren't reason enough to see it, Janet McTeer plays writer Mary McCarthy in it.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Holding pain at arm's length (Books - Everything Beautiful Began After by Simon Van Booy)
Everything Beautiful Began After by Simon Van Booy is a love story, or more than that, a connection story. The story of a connection between two men and a woman, each incomplete, in their way. Rebecca, an artist who searches for her mother, George, a drunk, a lover of ancient languages, and Henry, an archeologist who escapes to the past. They all end up in Athens and, in a nutshell, try to become whole again.
Van Booy looks to Athens for a sort of seedy grandeur and tries to make of the connection between his characters something of (appropriately enough) mythic proportion, only it doesn't quite work. He uses language to try to grace each character with a sort of specialness.
These characters all really hurt and I was truly interested in their stories, but I felt like Van Booy's writing was a lot like George's drinking.
Van Booy looks to Athens for a sort of seedy grandeur and tries to make of the connection between his characters something of (appropriately enough) mythic proportion, only it doesn't quite work. He uses language to try to grace each character with a sort of specialness.
Her father is out calling the name she's been given.
But her real name is known only by the change in light that comes without sound, and by the worms pushing up through the soaked crust of soil...
His chronic drinking began when he was fourteen, and inspired long walks through Portsmouth, New Hampshire, where he attended boarding school. It was a stark gray town, with lingering fog at the windows of houses...
Like her, he was from a small cottage, but in Wales, on a hillside.But I found a manic desperation in his attempt to make them all so pleasantly quirky. Trying to give the intersection of their stories a sense of magical coincidence - like the film The Double Life of Veronique - in the end it just came off twee.
"It was like camping every day," he confessed. "The house smelled of wet magazines and I shared my bed with a dozen animals."
At that moment, a French girl living in Paris called Natalie fainted in the supermarket.
These characters all really hurt and I was truly interested in their stories, but I felt like Van Booy's writing was a lot like George's drinking.
Booze washed all that nonsense away. It shallowed his perception. As a drunk, he was free to explore the earth without having to digest every moment, as if it were his last.What he really wanted to write was an opera. Van Booy tries with the lyricism of his language to dull the pain or to encase it in a warm beauty, but what was most interesting about these people was their pain, and in the end, I didn't want to be held at arm's length from it.
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Film - The Great Gatsby (2013)
There have been three film adaptations of The Great Gatsby that I know about: The 1949 film starring Alan Ladd, The 1974 film with Robert Redford and Mia Farrow, and the most recent incarnation with Leonardo DiCaprio directed by Baz Luhrmann. None of them have worked. I can't remember why that was my impression of the earlier versions, but the new 3-D blockbuster is mostly a disaster. There are some nice touches melding 1920s and contemporary choreography and music into an interesting hybrid. And I loved the billboard advertisement for spectacles that gazed down on the fictional wasteland between glitzy Long Island and New York City, but it seems as though Baz Luhrmann has forgotten he's no longer making Moulin Rouge. The film is all surface with no insides. It's as though Luhrmann were Nick at the film's beginning - completely dazzled. It's a shame considering that the whole story is that Nick grows up and becomes disillusioned by superficiality. Luhrmann used the text of the novel as narration rather than having Nick inhabit the action of the film. That may have worked had he chosen someone other than Tobey Maguire. Unfortunately Maguire can't play text and has no gravitas. Nick grows old beyond his years and tries to teach Gatsby not to live in the past, Maguire still seems to be trying to act the ingenue, even though he's almost 40. Had he felt his age, it might have been interesting. Luhrmann's idea of justifying the narration by having Nick talk to a psychiatrist was a misguided anachronism and having lines of type fly across the screen had no point other than to telegraph how self-conscious Luhrmann was about adapting a great novel. I loved Luhrmann's work when he had no money to waste. Strictly Ballroom and his wonderful La Boheme were all heart. I hope he finds some creative moxie again instead of hiding behind production values that communicate nothing but sheer hysteria.
Monday, May 27, 2013
Longing for the underside of oneself (Books - Harvard Square by Andre Aciman)
Andre Aciman is a contemporary voice of longing - longing for home while in exile, longing for lost love. I really enjoyed his Eight White Nights, a retrospective story of an intense romance. Harvard Square I found more difficult to enter, but not in a bad way. What I mean is that I had to work at it, particularly because one of the main characters is so unlikeable.
A father and son visit Harvard for a tour, as the son is about to apply to college. Harvard is the father's alma mater and the visit to his old stomping ground kicks up the dust for the old man. He remembers the final year of his graduate studies there: his classes, his girlfriends, but particularly a cab driver he meets at a cafe - Kalaj. Our narrator is Egyptian, Jewish, literature student, a sensitive intellectual like Aciman. Kalaj is Arab, by way of Paris, obnoxious, volatile, a sponger. They share a love of speaking French and drinking coffee and cheap wine. While our narrator tries to help Kalaj from completely destroying his own life through impulsivity, Kalaj tries to teach our narrator how to take the risk to live ferociously, honestly.
It began with the prologue, which I found unnecessary. I know that Aciman wants us to see which kind of man the father has become, but there was something obvious about the excuse he creates to visit his memories. I would have preferred something more integrated into the story proper. And Kalaj is intensely dislikeable, so to begin with I didn't want to spend much time with him, but knowing the rewards of an Aciman novel, I stuck with it. What unfolds is putatively the a story of friendship between two very different people but really, it's the story of two potential ways of living life that are present in everyone. Aciman makes no bones about it:
A father and son visit Harvard for a tour, as the son is about to apply to college. Harvard is the father's alma mater and the visit to his old stomping ground kicks up the dust for the old man. He remembers the final year of his graduate studies there: his classes, his girlfriends, but particularly a cab driver he meets at a cafe - Kalaj. Our narrator is Egyptian, Jewish, literature student, a sensitive intellectual like Aciman. Kalaj is Arab, by way of Paris, obnoxious, volatile, a sponger. They share a love of speaking French and drinking coffee and cheap wine. While our narrator tries to help Kalaj from completely destroying his own life through impulsivity, Kalaj tries to teach our narrator how to take the risk to live ferociously, honestly.
It began with the prologue, which I found unnecessary. I know that Aciman wants us to see which kind of man the father has become, but there was something obvious about the excuse he creates to visit his memories. I would have preferred something more integrated into the story proper. And Kalaj is intensely dislikeable, so to begin with I didn't want to spend much time with him, but knowing the rewards of an Aciman novel, I stuck with it. What unfolds is putatively the a story of friendship between two very different people but really, it's the story of two potential ways of living life that are present in everyone. Aciman makes no bones about it:
One of the things that drew me to Kalaj at first had nothing to do with his mischievous sixth sense, or his survivor's instincts, or his cantankerous outbursts that had strange ways of wrapping their arms around you till they choked you before they turned into laughter. Nor was it the mock-abrasive intimacy which put so many off but was precisely what felt so familiar to me, because it brought to mind those instant friendships of my childhood, when one insult about your mother followed by another about mine could bind two ten-year-olds for a lifetime.That's what I ended up liking about this book. It's all out there. As Kalaj becomes more and more recognizable as the flip side of, well, just about anyone who might pick up an Andre Aciman novel, the story grows compelling and, finally, quite touching. Here Aciman seems to be writing about longing for the underside of himself. His lost (or perhaps never found) ferocity. The story is honest and elegantly told, and its encompassing vision of the sides of human nature present in everyone that aren't simple or easy is compassionate.
Perhaps he was a stand-in for who I was, a primitive version of the me I'd lost track of and sloughed off living in America. My shadow self, my picture of Dorian Gray, my mad brother in the attic, my Mr. Hyde, my very, very rough draft. Me unmasked, unchained unleashed, unfinished: me untrammeled, me in rags, me enraged. Me without books, without finish without a green card. Me with a Kalashnikov.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Film - Oslo, August 31st (2011)
On Sheila's recommendation I saw Joachim Trier's Oslo, August 31st recently, starring Anders Danielsen Lie a triple-threat: musician, actor, and doctor. It's a beautiful interior portrait of a day in the life of an addict who, after time in rehab, is about to move back into society. He gets a pass for a job interview and visits people and places from his former life, aware only of the gulf between where he was when he exited that life and the present. Lie is one of those actors knows that the work is in preparing yourself to be inside the experience of the character and then to perform simple actions of living and let that work reveal itself. You never watch the effort to communicate a thought or feeling, the wish to be something other than he is, you only see him where he is. This film feels so private - a man trapped by his decisions, a man for whom disaster seems inevitable. What a beautiful film.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
On self-limiting enzymes, playfullness in science, and mothers... (Books - The Statue Within by Francois Jacob)
Over the last ten days, I attended the annual conference of the International Society for Autism Research, in San Sebastian Spain, where I presented some of my research and heard about the work of many, many others. It was impressive to see the huge amount and diversity of efforts focused on autism spectrum disorders. On my travels there and to nearby Barcelona, I also managed to get a little reading done.
I had started The Statue Within, the memoir of French biologist Francois Jacob a while ago, but never really got going. The conference put me in the mood to pick it up off the pile again and just as I began, I learned that Dr. Jacob had died at 92 years of age. Dr. Jacob's contribution to our understanding of how living organisms work was to be the first to observe and describe how the level of an enzyme produced in a bacterium can be responsive to its environment, eventually earning him, Jacques Monod and and Andre Lwoff the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965. He saw that e. coli, for example, could digest the sugar lactose for energy instead of glucose, but it produced the necessary digestive enzyme (lactase) only when lactose was present. How was this possible? It was learned around the same time that the production of any protein (such as an enzyme) was the product of certain sequences in our DNA (we call those sequences genes). These sequences became a template for RNA which, in turn, became a template for the production of a protein. The e. coli's genes were always equipped to produce lactase but, typically, a repressor (also a protein) was bound to the portion of our DNA responsible for producing lactase. In the presence of lactose, the repressor binds lactose instead of those genes. This accomplishes two things: 1) the lifting of the repression which means that the genes facilitate the production of lactase which digests the lactose and 2) it creates a self-limiting loop such that, when the lactose is gone, the repressor then binds the DNA once again and the production of lactase is turned-off. This was important to biology not just in understanding how e. coli are responsive to their environment, but because this model extends to any gene in any organism. Dr. Jacob and Jacques Monod realized for us that genes interact with their environment. Genes being present in an organism are not sufficient to accomplishing their action, they must be turned on" by some signal or, to use the term biologists use, they must be "expressed." Although, as is always true with biology, it is now understood that this is a general principle and this simple mechanism is, in fact, be varied upon and complicated infinitely.
I had started The Statue Within, the memoir of French biologist Francois Jacob a while ago, but never really got going. The conference put me in the mood to pick it up off the pile again and just as I began, I learned that Dr. Jacob had died at 92 years of age. Dr. Jacob's contribution to our understanding of how living organisms work was to be the first to observe and describe how the level of an enzyme produced in a bacterium can be responsive to its environment, eventually earning him, Jacques Monod and and Andre Lwoff the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965. He saw that e. coli, for example, could digest the sugar lactose for energy instead of glucose, but it produced the necessary digestive enzyme (lactase) only when lactose was present. How was this possible? It was learned around the same time that the production of any protein (such as an enzyme) was the product of certain sequences in our DNA (we call those sequences genes). These sequences became a template for RNA which, in turn, became a template for the production of a protein. The e. coli's genes were always equipped to produce lactase but, typically, a repressor (also a protein) was bound to the portion of our DNA responsible for producing lactase. In the presence of lactose, the repressor binds lactose instead of those genes. This accomplishes two things: 1) the lifting of the repression which means that the genes facilitate the production of lactase which digests the lactose and 2) it creates a self-limiting loop such that, when the lactose is gone, the repressor then binds the DNA once again and the production of lactase is turned-off. This was important to biology not just in understanding how e. coli are responsive to their environment, but because this model extends to any gene in any organism. Dr. Jacob and Jacques Monod realized for us that genes interact with their environment. Genes being present in an organism are not sufficient to accomplishing their action, they must be turned on" by some signal or, to use the term biologists use, they must be "expressed." Although, as is always true with biology, it is now understood that this is a general principle and this simple mechanism is, in fact, be varied upon and complicated infinitely.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Film - Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2011)
I was surprised by Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. Though predictably sentimental, the persistence of a young boy who is probably on the autism spectrum (Thomas Horn) in trying to make sense of what happened to his father on 9/11, made for a touching story with a sense of adventure and imaginative characters. I would have liked more time spent developing the people he meets on his journey instead of collapsing them into montage, but there are two good scenes with Viola Davis one with Jeffrey Wright, and a lovely relationship developed with Max von Sydow, who never speaks a word. Zoe Caldwell really disappears into her performance as the boy's grandmother, I must admit that I didn't even recognize her. As Sheila pointed out to me, the fact that a 12-year-old carries this feature length film is pretty impressive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)