Usually in a Murdoch novel, I find that the characters and their stories are so compelling that they subsume the book's higher ideas (because each of her books has them). One does traffic with the philosophical or moral questions she asks but one hardly notices. In The Nice and the Good she is not quite so successful at integrating the two, that or she intended for this novel to wear its theme on its sleeve, but I think not. Round about p 196, things began to pick up for me, interestingly just as the characters stopped thinking and began sleeping with people whom convention would tell them they probably shouldn't. Even as one character delivered the message:
And suppose that you had found what you were looking for, my dear child? Would you not have been led on from jealousy through deceit into cruelty? Human frailty forms a system, Jessica, and faults in the past have their endlessly spreading network of results. We are not good people, Jessica, and we shall always be involved in that great network, you and I. All we can do is constantly to notice when we begin to act badly, to check ourselves, to go back, to coax our weakness and inspire our strength, to call upon the names of virtues of which we know perhpas only the names. We are not good people, and the best we can hope for is to be gentle, to forgive each other and to forgive the past, to be forgiven ourselves and to accept this forgiveness, and to return again to the beautiful unexpected strangeness of the world. Isn't it, Jessica my child?This scene is heated, touching and ultimately hilarious and from this point, the novel really picks up. Suddenly we know all of the characters intimately, because Murdoch has set up their backstory, woven a greatly complex inner life for each of them on which we get to eavesdrop, established their interrelationships and now we get the payoff. Only, in most of her novels she manages to do this while being entertaining. Here I really found myself trudging through the set-up. But I found that the scene excerpted above, Ducane's subsequent being drawn in to a web of kinky vices and blackmail, and especially a killer of a scene in which Ducane and Pierce, one of the novel's younger characters, are drawn into a life-threatening situation which I won't ruin by writing about it here, really were worth trudging through.
Love, death, truth, and responsibility for our actions, that's the book in a nutshell. As one character observes:
Truth stares. Time moves. But the butterfly kissing goes on, the lips just brushing, the long shining bodies juxtaposed with almost awkward tenderness, not quite embracing. How like Richard it all is, she thought, so intellectual, so sensual.Ultimately I was glad that I stuck it out. Intellectual and sensual - exactly - and with an extraordinarily tense payoff scene.
My other posts on this book are here, here, and here.
hahaah!! sounds like the author was going for honesty with some kinky-ness i suppose!! i wonder who talks like that though!
(ooh..psst...been reading your blog for a bit..and i must say your list of book is impressive!)
I like Iris Murdoch, too, but I hadn't heard of this one. Thanks for putting it on my radar (and like Smriti I'm also guilty of reading--occasionally--but not always commenting. Sorry.)You do have a great list of books!
Smriti & ds - Thanks a lot for your comments (and praise). I enjoy hearing from you and am glad for your visits!
I remembered that you had read this novel sometime this year and I just finished it so wanted to come here and check out your thoughts. I'm somewhat relieved to see you feel this wasn't her strongest work. I'm slowly getting acquainted with Murdoch and this was only the second novel of hers i^ve read. I nmjoyed it for many reasons but I did think it got a bit messy and dragged a teensy bit. I look forward to reading a lot more of her because I am continually impressed with the details, the way she breaks her characters down and pushes them in interesting philosophical/moral directions.
Post a Comment